What Can Tennessee’s Governor Actually Do? We Tested the Campaign Promises.
Blackburn, Green and Pinkston are promising significant changes. Some fall squarely within a governor’s power. Others require legislators, courts, local officials or Washington.
The Tennessee Constitution gives the governor “supreme executive power.”
That sounds enormous.
It is not unlimited.
Tennessee’s governor runs the executive branch and is responsible for administering and enforcing state law. The office carries enormous influence over state departments, appointments, budgets, administrative priorities, legislation and clemency.
But executive power is not legislative power.
Tennessee’s attorney general has described the distinction plainly: executive authority administers and enforces laws; legislative authority makes, changes and repeals them. The governor possesses the powers granted by Tennessee’s Constitution and statutes — not a general power to govern by decree.
That distinction matters as Marsha Blackburn, Jerri Green and Lauren Pinkston tell voters what they would do after taking office.
Campaign promises describe intention. Governing requires authority.
Thank you for visiting The Redemption Project, if you enjoy this content please subscribe for more. If you are interested in the podcast you can listen to an episode here:
The Legislature still writes the laws
A Tennessee governor can propose legislation, lobby lawmakers, negotiate, sign bills, veto them and use the proposed state budget to establish priorities.
The governor cannot write state law alone.
Major changes involving taxation, criminal law, health policy, education policy and most new spending programs generally require passage through the Tennessee General Assembly.
That means many of the promises voters hear during this campaign are better understood as legislative agendas than powers a governor could exercise alone.
When Green calls for changes to Tennessee abortion law, Medicaid expansion or universal firearm-purchase background checks, those are policies her administration could advocate.
Her election alone would not put them into law. Green’s current platform includes, among other proposals, Medicaid expansion and universal background checks.
The same test applies to the other candidates.
Pinkston proposes legislation involving voting rights, gun policy, worker protections and data regulation. In several places, her platform itself distinguishes between actions a governor could take and measures requiring legislative cooperation.
Blackburn could likewise make tax reductions, criminal-law changes or election legislation priorities of her administration.
Lawmakers would still have to legislate.
The ballot chooses a governor. It does not erase the other branches of government.
Executive orders have boundaries
Governors can issue executive orders.
But an executive order is not a substitute for legislation.
Tennessee law permits governors to exercise authority already granted to the executive branch, and state legal precedent recognizes a basic separation: the governor administers and implements law but cannot assume the Legislature’s power to make or repeal it.
That distinction creates an important test for campaign promises involving executive orders.
Green’s Day One proposals include executive actions involving reproductive health care, Tennessee Highway Patrol cooperation with federal immigration enforcement and the future of the Tennessee Valley Authority.
Each raises the same question:
What existing authority would the governor actually be exercising?
A governor may direct executive agencies when state law gives the office discretion to do so.
An executive order could not, by itself, repeal an existing Tennessee statute.
And TVA is a federal entity. A Tennessee governor can oppose privatization, organize political resistance and advocate with federal officials, but the governor of Tennessee does not unilaterally determine the ownership structure of a federal agency.
The important distinction is not whether the underlying policy is good or bad.
It is whether the proposed mechanism matches the power of the office.
Tennessee’s attorney general provides an unusually clear example
One Green proposal presents an especially useful lesson in Tennessee government.
Her Day One plan says she would appoint an attorney general “dedicated to the Constitution.”
Tennessee governors do not appoint the state attorney general.
The Tennessee Supreme Court does.
Article VI, Section 5 of Tennessee’s Constitution gives that appointment to the justices of the Supreme Court, and the attorney general serves an eight-year term. The court used that process when it selected Jonathan Skrmetti in 2022.
That is not an ideological argument against Green’s desired attorney general.
It is authority the Tennessee Constitution assigns to another branch of government.
Blackburn’s district attorney promise raises a different authority question
Blackburn has called for action against district attorneys she says refuse to enforce Tennessee law.
There are mechanisms in Tennessee law for addressing prosecutors who categorically refuse to prosecute certain offenses.
But those mechanisms do not simply give the governor authority to fire an independently elected district attorney.
Tennessee law allows the attorney general, under specified circumstances, to seek appointment of another prosecutor to handle cases a district attorney refuses to prosecute. Separate 2026 legislation also created an audit-and-petition process involving the attorney general and Tennessee Supreme Court for specified circumstances in the 30th Judicial District.
That makes the operative question for Blackburn’s proposal straightforward:
What does “remove” mean, and which legal mechanism would her administration attempt to use?
Again, the distinction matters.
Political pressure is one kind of gubernatorial power.
Legal authority is another.
Sometimes campaigns acknowledge the limit themselves
Pinkston’s immigration platform provides an example of a campaign explicitly recognizing that distinction.
Her position acknowledges that governors cannot simply override federal mandates while arguing that states should use lawful authority available to them to resist federal overreach.
Whether voters agree with her proposed response is a separate question.
What matters here is the distinction between a governor’s political objective and the legal mechanism available to pursue it.
That distinction should become routine in this race.
Campaigns naturally tell voters what their candidate will do.
The more revealing question is often what their candidate can do.
Power is not the same as possibility
The next Tennessee governor will wield substantial power.
She will direct executive agencies.
She will appoint commissioners.
She will propose a state budget.
She will establish administrative priorities.
She can sign or veto legislation.
She can use the visibility of the office to pressure lawmakers, local officials and Washington.
But she will not govern alone.
The General Assembly will still write laws.
The courts will still interpret them.
Local governments will retain their own authority.
Federal power will remain federal power.
That does not make campaign promises meaningless.
It gives voters a better way to read them.
A promise that can begin through executive authority on inauguration day is one thing.
A promise requiring 132 lawmakers to cooperate is another.
A promise dependent on Congress, federal agencies, courts or local officials is another still.
And a promise that assigns the governor authority the office does not possess deserves particular scrutiny.
Campaign promises describe what candidates want government to do. Understanding the office tells voters what their governor may actually be able to deliver.
That is the difference between evaluating a campaign and evaluating a governor.
I am a retired detective and criminal justice / government educator based in Tennessee. I founded The Redemption Project, as a place to focus on civics, rebuild non-partisan trust, and provide educational and emotional grace while learning about the news. I also have a column in Knox TN Today. My reporting and commentary have also appeared in other outlets including; Governing, The Arizona Capitol Times, South Florida Sun Sentinel, Police1, among other state and regional outlets.
Thank you for helping to put campaign promises into perspective. I believe that many of us need a refresher course in how our state, local and federal governments function and interact.